Pharmacist wins case after refusal to provide abortion pills due to personal beliefs
Minnesota pharmacist George Badeaux and his attorney Charles Shreffler on their successful lawsuit against being forced to provide abortion pills
The Kentucky Supreme Court is leaving a sweeping abortion ban in place, pending further review.
A state court of appeals allowed two abortion bans to go into effect earlier this month, almost completely outlawing the procedure in the state. On Thursday, the state Supreme Court determined abortion clinics' request for an injunction due to "extraordinary cause" was not met.
While the highest court in the state refused to overturn the appeals court’s ruling, it agreed to hear further arguments from abortion activists and state Attorney General Daniel Cameron about whether the "trigger" laws can go into effect. Kentucky's laws do not have abortion exceptions for rape or incest.
Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron speaks to members of the press after the oral arguments of the Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center case were heard at the U.S. Supreme Court. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
LOUISIANA’S LAST 3 ABORTION CLINICS ARE LEAVING THE STATE
Following the court’s decision, leaders from Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the ACLU of Kentucky blasted the decision as putting people’s lives at risk.
"The Supreme Court’s decision to allow Kentucky’s abortion bans to remain in effect puts nearly a million people’s health care in jeopardy," the statement read. "Abortion is not only health care but also a critical individual freedom. Make no mistake: abortion bans result in tragic health outcomes and are a form of control over our bodies."
KENTUCKY SUPREME COURT DENIES STATE AG’S REQUEST TO HAVE ABORTION BAN REINSTATED
Justices Christopher Shea Nickell and Michelle M. Keller concurred with the court’s opinion but criticized the lower court’s decision to allow Cameron to enforce the sweeping laws.
The outside of Louisville's Planned Parenthood is shown. (AP Photo/Piper Hudspeth Blackburn, File)
"The Court of Appeals not only failed to give appropriate deference to the trial court but also failed to undertake a thorough analysis that is required in a case of this magnitude, failing even to set forth the appropriate standard of review," the justices wrote. "That being said, remanding this matter to the Court of Appeals to engage in a proper analysis would only further delay the final resolution of these compelling issues. Recognizing that matters of life, death, and health are at stake, time is of the essence."
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Cameron was muted in his statement responding to the ruling. Although he said he was "pleased with this victory for life and the rule of law," he focused on efforts to remove rules about abortion from courts.
"In Dobbs, the United States Supreme Court returned the issue of abortion to the elected representatives of the people of each state," Cameron said. "So that the promises of Dobbs may be realized, and to avoid being embroiled in another 50 years of political acrimony, courts around the country, and here at home, must allow our policy makers in the General Assembly to speak for the people they represent."
True Crime
The hottest stories ripped from the headlines, from crime to courts, legal and scandal.
By entering your email and clicking the Subscribe button, you agree to the Fox News Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content and promotional communications from Fox News. You understand that you can opt-out at any time.
