Meadows on Pelosi signaling no debates: '47 years of rhetoric vs. 4 years of a real record'
'They are afraid of the record,' says Mark Meadows reacting to Nancy Pelosi saying there should be no debates between Biden and Trump
If former Vice President Joe Biden backs out of participating in the upcoming presidential debates, then he's unfit to occupy the Oval Office. It's that simple.
The American people expect — and deserve — to hear from presidential candidates and learn where they stand on a multitude of important policy issues affecting our lives. We need to listen to their vision for America vis-a-vis their opponent so voters can choose their candidate wisely come Election Day.
This is precisely why the Commission on Presidential Debates was established in 1987 to ensure that debates between candidates running for president and vice president of the United States are a permanent part of the electoral process.
PELOSI SAYS BIDEN SHOULDN'T DEBATE TRUMP: 'I WOULDN'T LEGITIMIZE A CONVERSATION WITH HIM'
Yet, Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California is afraid that President Trump will crush Biden in the upcoming debates given the Democratic presidential nominee’s well-documented verbal stumbles and gaffes that have plagued his campaign since the outset. Hence, she's now encouraging Biden to scrap the scheduled debates altogether.
More from Opinion
“I don't think that there should be any debates," Pelosi said at a news conference at the Capitol on Thursday. "I wouldn't legitimize a conversation with him, nor a debate in terms of the presidency of the United States."
If this isn't a slap in the face to the electorate and a radical break with one of our most time-honored traditions in American democracy, what is?
In response to Pelosi's controversial remarks, Biden's camp said Thursday that he will stay the course and join the debates beginning Sept. 29 as planned.
"As long as the (debate) commission continues down the straight and narrow as they have, I'm going to debate him," Biden said. "I'm going to be a fact-checker on the floor as I'm debating him," he added.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR OPINION NEWSLETTER
As he should, for if Biden chooses not to debate the president — contrary to what his predecessors have done in every presidential election cycle for decades — voters will interpret that as a sign of weakness. He'll be viewed as a coward, not the commander in chief of the greatest military in the world.
The reality is that if Joe Biden is too feeble-minded to stand up to Donald Trump, a fellow American on U.S. soil, how would he be able to handle brutal dictators such as North Korea's Kim Jong Un, China's Communist Party leader Xi Jinping, or Russian President Vladimir Putin if elected president?
Not exactly the profile in courage expected from America's commander in chief.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
It's pitiful enough that Biden spends most of his time cowering in his basement instead of doing traditional retail politics and campaigning around the country. He could have met voters face to face — socially distanced, of course. If he ends up following Pelosi's orders and scrapping the debates, it'll boost Trump's reelection chances come November.
Cowards don't belong in the White House. Leaders who can handle a healthy exchange of ideas and defend their policies do.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FROM ADRIANA COHEN
Best of Opinion
Get the recap of top opinion commentary and original content throughout the week.
By entering your email and clicking the Subscribe button, you agree to the Fox News Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content and promotional communications from Fox News. You understand that you can opt-out at any time.