Trump warns he'll adjourn Congress if Senate does not confirm his nominees for administration vacancies
Every week they put up roadblocks, says President Trump at the daily briefing of the White House coronavirus task force.
Get all the latest news on coronavirus and more delivered daily to your inbox. Sign up here.
Even those who are not Trump devotees but would like to see the government function properly should sympathize with the president’s frustration over the way Senate Democrats have slow-walked his appointments.
To be sure, this is not the exclusive reason why there are vacancies in key executive-branch slots, including in posts relevant to the government’s COVID-19 response. The administration has been slow in making nominations to some positions (when asked about this, the president says it is an intentional strategy to shrink bloated government).
CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER
Trump can be very difficult to work for. And the baseless investigations of the administration have made it challenging to recruit high-caliber people — such people always have other options, and even the most public-spirited people would rather avoid situations where the need to retain counsel comes with the territory.
STEVE LEVY: CORONAVIRUS RELIEF – SHAME ON PELOSI, DEMOCRATS FOR HOLDING UP AID FOR SMALL BUSINESSES
Hopefully, though, the president was just blowing off steam earlier last week when he threatened to force an adjournment of Congress in order to enable recess appointments, by which he might temporarily install executive officers and federal judges. Realistically, the president has no power to force Congress to adjourn — it is up to the Senate to is decide whether it in session. The Constitution’s recess-appointment provision, moreover, is an anachronism that should be treated as a nullity.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
To take the latter first, it is not 1787 anymore. Modern transportation technology makes it easy to convene Congress if there is some emergency reason to do so.
Modern communications technology may soon usher in remote congressional sessions, in which senators and House members debate and vote from wherever they are situated outside of Washington — something that was seriously proposed when the coronavirus hit Capitol Hill a few weeks back. In short, we are no longer in an era when (a) Congress is not in session for months on end, (b) it is challenging to assemble lawmakers in Washington to conduct emergency business, and (c) the president has to have some way to fill key posts during a sudden crisis.
CLICK HERE TO READ THE REST OF THIS COLUMN IN THE NATIONAL REVIEW
Best of Opinion
Get the recap of top opinion commentary and original content throughout the week.
By entering your email and clicking the Subscribe button, you agree to the Fox News Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content and promotional communications from Fox News. You understand that you can opt-out at any time.