Wisconsin’s Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul said in an interview Tuesday that he would not investigate or prosecute anyone for having an abortion should the U.S. Supreme Court overturn Roe v. Wade and a currently unenforceable state ban takes effect.

The comments to The Associated Press are Kaul’s strongest to date about how he would react to the Supreme Court undoing the landmark 1973 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide. A Wisconsin ban enacted in 1849 has been unenforceable under Roe v. Wade, but would take effect again if conservative Supreme Court justices decide to overrule Roe, as they suggested during oral arguments this month in a case over Mississippi’s 15-week ban on abortions. A decision is expected this summer.

PRO-LIFE ADVOCATES RIP KAMALA HARRIS' PREDICTION THAT ‘WOMEN WLL DIE’ IF ROE V. WADE IS OVERTURNED

Abortion is expected to be a central issue in the 2022 election in Wisconsin and other states. Kaul is up for reelection along with Democratic Gov. Tony Evers. Both are supporters of abortion rights and face Republican opponents who want to make abortion illegal again.

An anti-abortion demonstrator protests in front of the Supreme Court building, December 1, 2021. (REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst)

Wisconsin is one of 21 states with laws or constitutional amendments already in place that would make them certain to attempt to ban abortion as quickly as possible, according to an analysis from the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights.

Wisconsin is one of nine states with an abortion ban law that predates Roe v. Wade, according to the analysis.

Kaul told the AP that it’s not clear what exactly the law in Wisconsin would be if Roe v. Wade is struck down. That would depend on exactly how the Supreme Court rules and resolving legal issues related to enforcing a law that hasn’t been in use for nearly 50 years, he said.

CHRISTIANS FROM DIFFERENT RACES, DENOMINATIONS AND PARTIES GATHER TO PRAY BEFORE SUPREME COURT ABORTION CASE

"Even if courts were to interpret that law as being enforceable, as attorney general I would not use the resources of the Wisconsin Department of Justice either to investigate alleged violations of that abortion ban or to prosecute alleged violations of it," Kaul said.

Even if Kaul would take that approach, most prosecutions for violating any abortion ban would most likely be brought by district attorneys at the county level.

Kaul said the Justice Department is focused on investigating crimes of statewide importance like homicide, sexual assault and arson.

The exterior of the U.S. Supreme Court building is seen after justices allowed abortion providers to pursue a legal challenge to a ban on most abortions, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., December 10, 2021. REUTERS/Sarah Silbiger (REUTERS/Sarah Silbiger)

"Diverting resources from those important cases to the kinds of cases that could be brought under abortion ban, which I also believe to be unconstitutional, is not something that I would do as attorney general," he said.

Kaul said enforcing an abortion ban would undermine public safety.

"And it would result in serious negative health consequences, including potentially the death of women who wanted to seek to exercise what for nearly 50 years been understood to be a constitutionally protected right," he said.

Abortion rights advocates and anti-abortion protesters demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of the United States. (Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images (Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Two Republicans have launched campaigns to challenge Kaul: Fond do Lac County District Attorney Eric Toney and former state Rep. Adam Jarchow, of Balsam Lake.

Toney said Kaul was a politician, not a law enforcement officer.

"I am proudly pro-life and I will defend the police and defend our Wisconsin laws, including our abortion ban, if allowed," Toney said.

Jarchow blasted Kaul as "a wholly owned subsidiary of the Washington DC swamp."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"He is the very definition of partisanship and a failed leader," Jarchow said. "So, while it’s disappointing that he says he will not follow the law, it’s not surprising."