Appeals court blocks gov't rule on union posters
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}A federal appeals court on Tuesday temporarily blocked the National Labor Relations Board from making millions of businesses put up posters informing workers of their right to form a union.
The rule requiring most private employers to display the posters was supposed to take effect on April 30, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said that can't happen until legal questions are resolved.
The temporary injunction followed a federal judge's ruling in South Carolina last week that the labor board exceeded congressional authority when it approved the poster requirement in 2011. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., had previously found the NLRB rule acceptable, but limited how the agency could enforce it.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}Business groups have complained the posters are an unfair government effort to promote union organizing. The labor board contends the posters help workers more clearly understand their rights and protections under federal labor law.
National Association of Manufacturers President and CEO Jay Timmons called the appeals court's injunction "a positive step in overturning this harmful rule."
"The 'posting requirement' is an unprecedented attempt by the board to assert power and authority it does not possess," Timmons said.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}NLRB chairman Mark Pearce said the board would instruct its regional offices not to apply the poster rule while litigation is pending. He said the board would appeal the adverse South Carolina ruling, as well as the part of the Washington, D.C., ruling that restricts how the rule can be enforced.
"We continue to believe that requiring employers to post this notice is well within the board's authority and that it provides a genuine service to employees who may not otherwise know their rights under our law," Pearce said in a written statement.
The NLRB rule requires more than 6 million businesses to post an 11-by-17-inch notice in a prominent location explaining the right of workers to join a union and bargain collectively to improve wages and working conditions. The posters also explain that workers have a right not to join a union and that it is illegal for union officials to coerce employees into unionizing.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}Similar government posters explaining federal anti-discrimination laws and workplace safety rules are already fixtures in company break rooms. But U.S. District Judge David Norton, in his ruling last Friday in South Carolina, said federal laws specifically allow government agencies to require the display of those posters at work sites. By contrast, Norton said, the National Labor Relations Act contains no such language.
NLRB attorneys argued the board has the authority to require posters even without specific congressional approval.
Meanwhile, Senate Republicans said Tuesday they would join a separate lawsuit challenging President Barack Obama's recess appointments to the NLRB. The lawsuit, pending in Washington state, argues that Obama illegally bypassed the Senate to appoint three members to the board in January.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}The White House claims the Senate was in recess, but Republicans claim they effectively blocked recess appointments by scheduling a series of brief, pro-forma sessions.
Miguel Estrada, a former senior Justice Department official, will write a supporting brief on behalf of Senate Republicans.
___
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}Follow Sam Hananel's labor coverage on Twitter at http://twitter.com/shananel