SD law requiring ballot petition workers to disclose personal information blocked by appeals court
South Dakota judge ruled that the law would violate the First Amendment
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld a lower court's decision to block parts of a South Dakota law that would have required ballot petition workers to publicly disclose their personal identification information.
The Republican-controlled Legislature in 2020 passed a law that would have required paid ballot measure circulators to list their personal information, including phone number, residential address, email address and driver's license information, in a directory. The law was just one attempt by lawmakers in recent years to add barriers to ballot measures, which have given progressive causes a chance at enactment in the politically red state.
Circuit Judge Steven Grasz wrote in an opinion for a three-judge panel of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals that being forced to disclose the information would be "chilling in today's world" and the law would violate the First Amendment.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}SD GOV. NOEM NOT CHARGED FOR HER USE OF STATE GOVERNMENT AIRCRAFTS, PROSECUTOR SAYS
United States District Judge Lawrence Piersol issued a temporary injunction against the law last year.
A federal appeals court blocked a law that would have required ballot workers to publicly disclose their personal information.
SOUTH DAKOTA GOV. KRISTI NOEM PROMISES TO REPEAL STATE TAX ON GROCERIES
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}Dakotans for Health, an organization that was formed around a ballot measure to expand Medicaid eligibility, sued to have the law overturned. The organization is now focused on placing a proposed constitutional amendment on the 2024 ballot to codify abortion rights.
"Our state Legislature continues to try to destroy the initiative process with these kinds of laws," said Rick Weiland, the director of Dakotans for Health. "We've had success in the federal courts based on the First Amendment."
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}Weiland said that the ruling from three appeals court judges who were appointed under former President Donald Trump showed the importance of "protecting a long-standing tradition to circulate and pass laws at the ballot box."