Oregon GOP senators sue to run for reelection following walkout that led to their disqualification
OR Republicans earlier boycotted several Democrat-led bills with a 6-week walkout that led to many unexcused absences
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}- Several Republican state senators in Oregon have accumulated a large number of absences during a six-week walkout aimed at halting legislative progress on bills regarding abortion rights and gun safety.
- Oregon lawmakers who accrue 10 or more unexcused absences cannot seek reelection, according to constitutional amendment Measure 113.
- In an attempt to run for reelection next year, five GOP senators are now trying to convince the Oregon Court of Appeals that Measure 113’s language misled voters when they passed the law.
Five Republican state senators in Oregon are suing to be allowed to run for reelection next year even though they accumulated a large number of unexcused absences during a walkout aimed at blocking votes on abortion rights and gun safety.
Oregon voters passed a constitutional amendment last year that says any lawmaker who accrues 10 or more unexcused absences during a legislative session is blocked from seeking reelection, after Republicans used the tactic repeatedly in previous years.
But the senators say a vagary in the way the law is written means they can seek another term, Oregon Public Broadcasting reported.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}OREGON GOP SENATORS END 6-WEEK WALKOUT FOLLOWING NEW AGREEMENTS
The amendment says a lawmaker is not allowed to run "for the term following the election after the member’s current term is completed." Since a senator's term ends in January while elections are held in November, they argue the penalty doesn't take effect immediately, but instead, after they've served another term.
Senate Republican Minority Leader Tim Knopp and four other senators filed the lawsuit on Friday against Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade. The other four are Sens. Daniel Bonham, Suzanne Weber, Lynn Findley and Dennis Linthicum.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}The Oregon State Capitol Building is seen in Salem. Several Oregon state senators, who became disqualified from reelection by accruing too many unexcused absences, are now suing. (Getty Photos)
The lawmakers hope to convince the Oregon Court of Appeals that voters were misled about the language in Measure 113 when they passed the law.
Ten conservative state senators racked up enough unexcused absences to violate Measure 113 during a six-week walkout earlier this year.
OREGON GOP WALKOUT OVER DEMOCRATS’ ‘EXTREME’ BILLS STALLS TWO-YEAR BUDGET PLAN
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}The boycott raised doubts about whether the Legislature would be able to pass a new budget. But lawmakers reached a deal which brought Republicans back to the Capitol in exchange for Democratic concessions on measures covering abortion, transgender health care and gun rights.
The walkout was the longest in state history and the second-longest in the United States.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}Griffin-Valade's office didn't immediately return an email message seeking comment on Saturday.
Earlier this month, Griffin-Valade, who is the state elections chief, issued a news release saying the 10 state senators can't run for reelection in 2024. She made the announcement to clear up confusion over how reelection rules would affect the senators.