100 GOP lawmakers reintroducing conscience protection bill amid concerns about Biden’s HHS

close

Video

Fox News Flash top headlines for November 19

Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com.

FIRST ON FOX: One hundred GOP lawmakers are reintroducing legislation Friday to protect conscience rights, alleging that the Biden administration wasn't doing enough on that issue.

The Conscience Protection Act to Defend Rights of Health Care Providers comes as Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Sec. Xavier Becerra has been accused by conservatives of not fulfilling his promise to protect religious liberty.

"Defending the conscience rights of healthcare providers should be of great interest to all Americans, and is of grave importance to me as a physician, especially in light of recent failures to do so by the Biden Administration," said Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., who introduced the bill.

HHS MEMO SHOWS DEPARTMENT MOVING TO UNDO TRUMP-ERA ACTIONS AIMED AT BETTER PROTECTING RELIGIOUS LIBERTY

UNITED STATES - DECEMBER 3: Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., and members of the House Freedom Caucus conduct a news conference to call on Attorney General William Barr to release findings of an investigation into allegations of 2020 election fraud, outside the Capitol on Thursday, December 3, 2020. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

"Secretary Becerra had committed to House Appropriators that he would ensure the protection of the legal rights of conscience for providers – but sadly this has not occurred. Therefore, this bill is necessary to dissuade employers from threatening or taking retaliation for actions by healthcare providers that should be, but aren’t being protected by this administration."

Harris' legislation contains measures designed to prevent retaliation against health care workers who don't participate in abortions. That became an issue earlier this year when Biden's HHS withdrew a Justice Department (DOJ) referral on a Vermont hospital allegedly forcing a nurse to participate in an abortion. He also cited the former Trump administration's decision to withhold California Medicaid funds due to alleged violations of the Weldon Amendment.

Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra testifies before the Senate Finance Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on June 10. (AP)

DOJ DROPS CASE OF VERMONT HOSPITAL ALLEGEDLY FORCING NURSE TO PARTICIPATE IN ABORTION

Earlier this month, Becerra sent members of Congress a letter informing them that while that particular lawsuit was dismissed, his department told both the complainant and medical center that it would continue investigating the underlying complaint.

"HHS remains committed to the enforcement of all its legal authorities, including statutes which protect the exercise of conscience and religious freedom, and we appreciate having the benefit of your views on this matter," he said.

WASHINGTON - AUGUST 15:  The exterior of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is seen August 15, 2006 in Washington, DC.   (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Fox News reported earlier this week on an internal HHS memo asking Becerra to rescind certain Trump-era provisions beefing up religious liberty protections. Although Becerra pledged to continue HHS' protection of conscience rights, both his department and the White House have provoked concerns among some.

Harris' bill received backing from multiple pro-life groups and Archbishop of Baltimore and Chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Committee on Pro-Life Activities William E. Lori.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"It is hard to imagine a more blatant civil rights violation than being forced to abandon your beliefs and take part in ending an innocent human life," said Lori. "HHS found that the University of Vermont Medical Center forced a nurse, against her known religious beliefs, to do just that. This is not only fundamentally wrong, but a direct violation of federal law. Yet the Department of Justice voluntarily dismissed the case against UVMC."

"We have said before that the need for the Conscience Protection Act cannot be questioned. The need is more vital now than ever."