Attorney General Merrick Garland on Wednesday declined a request to examine whether the civil rights of some Jan. 6 defendants have been violated due to the lack of a speedy trial and said it's the job of their lawyers to make that argument in court.

At a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing, Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., said he toured the D.C. Department of Corrections last week and met with some of the 20 prisoners still being held because of their participation in the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol Hill riot. Clyde argued that detaining these people for so long violates the 6th Amendment to the Constitution, which guarantees the right to a "speedy and public trial."

"You work to uphold the civil rights of all Americans," Clyde added. "I think in this case, their civil rights are being violated, and I would appreciate you looking into that."

TOP FBI OFFICIAL DODGES WHEN CRUZ ASKS IF AGENTS PARTICIPATED IN JAN. 6 RIOT

Attorney General Merrick Garland

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Wednesday was pressed on whether the civil rights violations of some Jan. 6 rioters have been violated after being imprisoned for two years without a trial. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

A report from Just Security this month said 11 of the 20 being held have not accepted a plea agreement and have not been brought to trial, while the other nine have been convicted or have pleaded guilty.

But Garland didn’t commit to examining the defendants’ cases, and instead argued that their lawyers have the right to argue before a judge that their 6th Amendment rights have been violated.

GOP SENATORS PUSH BACK AS DOJ ROLLS OUT EXPANDED DOMESTIC TERRORISM UNIT DUE TO JAN. 6 RIOT

Rep. Andrew Clyde

Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., met with some of the Jan. 6 defendants last week, and argued to AG Garland that their 6th Amendment rights have been violated. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

"I don’t know the specifics of individual cases," Garland said. "The beauty of the 6th Amendment is that each of those people is entitled to a lawyer, has a lawyer who can make a speedy trial argument in the court."

"Oftentimes lawyers ask for more time, oftentimes they ask for exceptions for discovery," Garland added. "There was an enormous amount of discovery in those cases. But I don’t know anything about those particular cases."

When Clyde asked whether a two-year wait meets the "speedy trial" clause of the 6th Amendment, Garland replied, "It can if the exceptions to the Speedy Trial Act are met. Those are the responsibility of the lawyers for those defendants."

"I would like you to look into that, because to me, I don’t think waiting two years for your trial complies with the 6th Amendment of the Constitution," Clyde said.

TWO YEARS LATER: AN OVERVIEW OF JAN. 6 AND WHAT TOOK PLACE AFTER

Jan. 6 riot

Protesters try to break through a police barrier, Jan. 6, 2021, at the Capitol in Washington. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez, File) (AP Photo/Julio Cortez, File)

"This is an argument to be made before the judge," Garland replied. "The judge has the authority to dismiss a case for a violation of the Speedy Trial Act."

Several House Republicans met with the Jan. 6 defendants in the Washington, D.C. jail last week, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., who said after her visit that the rights of the prisoners have been ignored.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"Their due process rights are being violated and they have been mistreated and treated as political prisoners," she said.